Fruits from the Tree of Malice
Newly translated documents show how far Soviet wickedness extended.
In the Spring 2010 issue of City Journal, I described an archive of documents from Soviet government agencies smuggled to the West by the Russian researcher Pavel Stroilov and the Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky. These documents, I noted, were available to anyone who wanted to consult them. But nobody did. Publishers were indifferent. Only a fraction of the documents had been translated into English. This was, I argued, a symptom of the worlds dangerous indifference to the enormity of Communist crimes.
Within weeks of the articles appearance, I received hundreds of e-mails. Many came from victims of Soviet Communismthere is no shortage of themappalled that the documents were not better known. They volunteered to translate them. Thanks to their efforts, more have become available in English, and many of them are very much worth reading.
It is one thing to know abstractly, for example, that the Soviets sponsored terrorism in the Middle East. It is another to read a newly translated memorandum from longtime KGB head Yuri Andropov to Communist Party general secretary Leonid Brezhnev requesting authorization to fund a detailed plan by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) to kill civilians around the world:
In a confidential conversation at a meeting with the KGB resident in Lebanon in April this year, [PFLP official] Wadia Haddad outlined a prospective program of sabotage and terrorism by the PLFP [sic]. . . . The PLFP is currently preparing a number of special operations, including strikes against large oil storage installations in various countries, . . . the destruction of oil tankers and super-tankers, actions against American and Israeli representatives in Iran, Greece, Ethiopia, Kenya, an attack on the Diamond center in Tel Aviv, etc. . . . We feel it would be feasible, at the next meeting, to give a generally favorable response to Wadia Haddads request.
W. Haddad, Andropov notes archly, is fully aware of our opposition to terrorism in principle. Unstated but implied: He is fully aware of our enthusiasm for terrorism in practice.
The Soviet Union is gone; the PFLP survives. It recently issued a statement denouncing the Middle East peace talks and the surrender to the imperialist demands of the U.S. and Israel. One of the newly translated documents might give pause to those inclined to see in the PFLP a consistent champion of anti-imperialism, however. It records the Politburos decision to provide the PFLP with special equipment to the sum of 15 million rubles in exchange for a collection of art objects of the Ancient World. The Soviet Ministry of Culture was charged with appraising the collection and determining a suitable place to house the golden store. Given the PFLPs supposedly principled anti-imperialism, it is odd that nowhere in this document do we see plans for returning these art objects to the ancient world.
Also interesting is a document suggesting the pains taken by the KGB to ensure the eruption of spontaneous global demonstrations against Israel. According to the KGBs estimates, spontaneously outraged Muslims cost approximately a quarter-rupee apiece: The KGB station in India is capable of organizing a protest demonstration at the U.S. Embassy to India, with up to 20,000 Muslims participating. The expenses for organizing the demonstration would amount to 5,000 Indian rupees and be covered from the funds allocated by the CPSU Central Committee for special measures in India in 19691971.
It would not quite be fair to interpret the Soviet Unions anti-Israel agitation as an expression of ideological anti-Semitism, though. After all, the documents show the Soviets willingnesseagerness, evento put Israeli Communists on the bankroll:
That there was scarcely a miserable group of miscreants on the planet that the Soviets did not, in some fashion, fund, train, and encourage is vaguely known now by some; it should be widely known by all. It is endlessly averred, for example, that the United States supported authoritarian anti-Communist regimes in Central America simply out of paranoia. Our support may have been unwise, but there was no paranoia at work, as we can see in a 1980 document in which the secretariat of the Central Committee resolves to grant the request of the leadership of the Communist Party of El Salvador and task the Ministry of Civil Aviation with arranging, in SeptemberOctober 1980, a shipment of 6080 tons of small arms and ammunition of Western manufacture from Hanoi to Havana, for the Cuban comrades to transfer it to our Salvadoran friends.
Above all, the documents suggest that the most enduringly pernicious fruit of the Soviet Union was its propaganda. The cliché view of the United States as a nation whose foreign policy may best be understood as an expression of racisman interpretation that continues to hinder American efforts to do the world any goodlargely emerged thanks to the Soviet Unions energetic efforts, as a 1970 document details:
Even had they no modern relevance, these archives should receive wide dissemination and readership; the world owes the victims of Communism that respect. But clearly, they are also of immediate relevance to the contemporary world. Among other things, they draw, as Stroilov writes, quite an impressive picture of a world-wide terrorist network, and leave one in no doubt that the Soviet Union deserves all the discredit for the emergence of international terrorism as a major factor in global politics.
To assign all the discredit to the Soviets is overly generous; there is plenty to go around. The newly translated documents do confirm that the Soviet Union deserves much of it, however, and show clearly the many ways a tree of malice may continue to bear fruit long after the gardeners demise.
Claire Berlinski, a City Journal contributing editor, is an American journalist who lives in Istanbul.